首页> 外文OA文献 >Network-regularized Sparse Logistic Regression Models for Clinical Risk Prediction and Biomarker Discovery
【2h】

Network-regularized Sparse Logistic Regression Models for Clinical Risk Prediction and Biomarker Discovery

机译:临床风险的网络正则化稀疏Logistic回归模型   预测和生物标志物发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Molecular profiling data (e.g., gene expression) has been used for clinicalrisk prediction and biomarker discovery. However, it is necessary to integrateother prior knowledge like biological pathways or gene interaction networks toimprove the predictive ability and biological interpretability of biomarkers.Here, we first introduce a general regularized Logistic Regression (LR)framework with regularized term $\lambda \|\bm{w}\|_1 +\eta\bm{w}^T\bm{M}\bm{w}$, which can reduce to different penalties, includingLasso, elastic net, and network-regularized terms with different $\bm{M}$. Thisframework can be easily solved in a unified manner by a cyclic coordinatedescent algorithm which can avoid inverse matrix operation and accelerate thecomputing speed. However, if those estimated $\bm{w}_i$ and $\bm{w}_j$ haveopposite signs, then the traditional network-regularized penalty may notperform well. To address it, we introduce a novel network-regularized sparse LRmodel with a new penalty $\lambda \|\bm{w}\|_1 + \eta|\bm{w}|^T\bm{M}|\bm{w}|$to consider the difference between the absolute values of the coefficients. Andwe develop two efficient algorithms to solve it. Finally, we test our methodsand compare them with the related ones using simulated and real data to showtheir efficiency.
机译:分子谱数据(例如基因表达)已用于临床风险预测和生物标志物发现。但是,有必要整合其他先验知识,例如生物学途径或基因相互作用网络,以提高生物标志物的预测能力和生物学解释性。在这里,我们首先介绍一个通用的正则Logistic回归(LR)框架,该框架具有正则项$ \ lambda \ | \ bm {w} \ | _1 + \ eta \ bm {w} ^ T \ bm {M} \ bm {w} $,可以减少不同的罚款,包括套索,弹性网和具有不同$ \ bm的网络正规条款{M} $。通过循环协调算法可以轻松地统一解决该框架问题,该算法可以避免逆矩阵运算并加快计算速度。但是,如果那些估计的$ \ bm {w} _i $和$ \ bm {w} _j $具有相反的符号,则传统的网络规范的惩罚可能效果不佳。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一个新的网络规范的稀疏LR模型,并带有新的惩罚$ \ lambda \ | \ bm {w} \ | _1 + \ eta | \ bm {w} | ^ T \ bm {M} | \ bm {w} | $考虑系数绝对值之间的差异。并且我们开发了两种有效的算法来解决它。最后,我们测试了我们的方法,并使用模拟和真实数据将它们与相关方法进行了比较,以显示其效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号